REALGTAIV (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

lmao dat bitch said u get the photo ..lmaoooooooooooooooo i woulda beat her ass ripp me off yea right deez nutz

ashihtaka (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Fat bitch got ownnnnned

AppleSouffle (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Her name is Kelli Filkins. What a stupid, greedy, heartless sack of manure.No one is going to buy a picture of a telephone. She wasn't the slightest bit contrite. I agree, she should have done some jail done. But at least $5,000 is a big enough zap to make scamming not worth her while.I expect the local police will or already have arrested her for some other offense.

killadanny21 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

lmao! she doesnt like to work...she likes to make babies.

ericsan4344 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

who would want photographs of a cell phone??

lcazor555 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

wow.... the defendant said "thank you" XD so she is obviosly not going to stop this is encouraging her.. i really hoped instead of 5000 she shouldve made it 500 thousand! for her talking back to her like that "you cant read?" lol i hope she shouldve spent jail time...

henh32 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

What a c*nt

TehMikeyLee (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

she could have avoided this by putting ***photos of the phone only in the fine print LOL

parkvillepictures (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Pure greed!!! I have the same photos for one tenth of that price if anyone's interested.

garrettkirkthompson (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"Judgement for the plaintiff in the amount of $5000"Bullshit! That scammer bitch should spend a couple of years in prison.Let's think about this people. These scammers only get busted one in many times. For arguement's sake, let's say they get caught 1 in 5 times. If all they have to do is pay back the victim without jailtime, they're still going to have made a profit on the other four and they're still going to be making a profit in the future. We need to get tough on crime.