sidlittle (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

chrispyt77, check out 'september clues' and '911 taboo'.cheers

chrispyt77 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

This is very interesting...But I thought it was essentially a glass box that the plane crashed into. Of course inside, the steel frames would slow it down.Didn't a jet wheel and other bits land on the ground on the street?

paulagloria (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Watching this I balance between awe and utter heartbreak, brought on by careful intellect and the opening of emotion that the music unfolds. I feel both horrified and deeply grateful to be alive to be taken to a greater level of knowingness eager to once again leave behind what I thought was true. This is about so much more than planes and no-planes, inside job vs media job. It is about our collective moment here on the planet, both perpetrators of the crime and victims.

sidlittle (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Likewise, if you believe a nose-cone can pass through and exit the tower intact (see 'sept clues part1') then that's your right. Finally, have a look at the following video here on youtube that demonstrates the 'logic' of the 'experts' that perpetually try and debunk all this.watch?v=bJeeUtWmZ0E Peace

sidlittle (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

and remember, all this is just information , that's all. Believe what you want but be true to your 'self. If you think it's perfectly okay for the same plane to have differing approaches, speeds , shapes, colours in different videos, then fine, it's none of my business. If you think an aluminum plane passing INTACT, WITHOUT decelerating through steel columns AND reinforced concrete floors (people forget that)is perfectly in line with Newton's 1st and 3rd laws of motion, good luck.

sidlittle (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Just a reminder to those who are curious to watch the 'september clues' series on youtube or livevideo. There were 5 'live' shots shown across the networks that day. Not one of those shots show flight 175 crashing into the south face of the south tower but merely show at best, 'silhouettes' passing behind the tower. The 'butter plane' footage as seen in this video came later.

sidlittle (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

blackrock, why on earth is it insulting to doubt the veracity of the official version of events? Like i said to another poster who had nothing to say, why not check out the website 'patriotsquestion911*com* . Don't forget to have a good look through the family members section. cheers

Perigaeum (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Again and again: We, sadly, see applied physics in this video.The only blatant fake appearing there is to be found in the text inserts. Remember: *CT*ists are addicted to over-argumentation. They easily publish 100+ pages during a paranoia-spree. Science always strives to keep it lean and coherent.

digitalshark (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Look, I'm not telling you to trust ANYTHING you see on TV or ANYTHING the US Government says. What I can say with 100% certainty is that I saw A PLANE (not a missile, not a cartoon) hit the second tower with my own eyes. To all of you who attack "Fake Plane" detractors, I hereby challenge you to prove I am shill for anyone or anything. I'm waiting.

teabowbraine (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

KIDS