Search:

battlebots robot combat build robot fighting robots robot weapons robot competition rovio robot robot wars



Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question (RAW FTGE)

Robot Building and Competition Videos
Robot Building and Competition Videos Robot Building and Competition Videos
Robot Building and Competition Videos

**MUST READ!! http://www.CreationOnTheWeb.co... for a true timeline of events on the actual day of filming, see here (VERY INTERESTING READING): http://www.tccsa.tc/video/time... for further reading still (it's somewhat technical and long, but underlines that the question cannot be answered in a way that supports evolutionary notions): http://www.trueorigin.org/dawk... Dawkins is dumbfounded after being asked to "give an example of a genetic mutation or an evolutionary process which can be seen to increase the information in the genome" - quite a reasonable question that one would expect Oxford University's Professor for the Public Understanding of Science - so adamant in his belief in evolution - could and would provide an answer for.He then responds but DOES NOT answer the question that was asked of him. Why? Because he has no idea when it comes to processes that add information to the genome - the very premise of what he proclaims!! His writings claiming that he was not stumped are a desperate endeavour to cover his cowardly tracks (and on a further note, his writings don't cover any of these "information adding" processes either).Check out the URL on the video (or above) for THE REAL EXPLANATION OF EVENTS!! And for even more insight into Dawkins' lack of enthusiasm to be interviewed by creationists, check out the belowmentioned CD. Dawkins was put to shame in a debate against creationists in 1986 at Oxford University and was left so speechless and defeated that he decided never to grant creationists with publicity time again - this policy was adopted not because he simply does not want to grant creationists with the publicity as he so cowardly insists, but because he is terrified his reputation will be tainted by his inability to front up to creationist arguments head-on (as this YOUTUBE video proves). The CD is available from the following link: http://www.creationontheweb.co... be as "ignorant" as creationists allegedly are - delve a little deeper and you will be surprised at what you'll find.NB: The reasons for posting this video is not to disprove evolution or to prove creation - but merely to show that this man who is at the forefront of the modern-day evolutionist movement does not have an answer for the most fundamental question to what he proclaims. There are actually three processes [at the time of writing] that scientists know of that add information to the genome - none of which Dawkins covers in any of his responses - websites, books or otherwise.

Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm
Author: JJjayco

Length: 01:55
Rating: 5.00
Views: 791780

Tags: creation  creationism  dawkins  evolution  genetics  genome  ministries  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

JJjayco (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Hi guys. Those interested in reading comments that have been posted, you will need to click "SHOW SPAM MESSAGES" (you may have to click "page2" of comments first). Someone has gone through and marked all comments as SPAM and they therefore do not get listed automatically. Sorry for the inconvenience.Regards, JJjayco
JJjayco (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
RESPONSE PART 2 of 2To believe in theistic evolution means believing that God called billions of years of suffering, death, extinction, bloodshed and cruelty 'all very good' - and not the results of the Fall and the subsequent Curse on Creation, as the Apostle Paul understood it. creationontheweb . com /content/view/3055/ Copy this URL into your browser to see other articles on this topic.
JJjayco (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
RESPONSE PART 1 of 2Dr Collins' response glosses over the huge problems involved in theistic evolution - the God of the Bible is the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, who believed in a real Flood, a literal Adam and Eve who literally fell into sin, and a recent creation (in which people were there from the beginning of the creation, not millions of years later, towards the end of some long creation process - see Mark 10:6).
JJjayco (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
RESPONSE PART 2 of 2To believe in theistic evolution means believing that God called billions of years of suffering, death, extinction, bloodshed and cruelty 'all very good' - and not the results of the Fall and the subsequent Curse on Creation, as the Apostle Paul understood it. creationontheweb . com /content/view/3055/ Copy this URL into your browser to see other articles on this topic.
JJjayco (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
RESPONSE PART 1 of 2Dr Collins' response glosses over the huge problems involved in theistic evolution - the God of the Bible is the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, who believed in a real Flood, a literal Adam and Eve who literally fell into sin, and a recent creation (in which people were there from the beginning of the creation, not millions of years later, towards the end of some long creation process - see Mark 10:6).
Constantine99999 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Err, well, ummm, doh! Great video!
darpachief (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
looooooool....stumped like a polititian. Sounds like Tony Blair lieing.
rastinchacha7 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Even kids understand that their Christmas/birthday gifts did not materialise out of thin air, but were PLACED THERE BY SOMEONE, though they did not see them.We all know that the existence of every Tangible Product can be traced to a Responsible Maker/Agent. (Eg, buildings, cars, ships, roads, computers, crime, whatever).The hypocrisy of atheists is the belief in the above principle, but the blatant denial of the same principle where earth/humans are concerned.
imurban (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Wow! Did I miss it, or did he completely gloss over the actual question?
Roncip (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
He wanted to say that after the fish comes the chips. HAHAHA what a loser!


Robot Building and Competition Videos © 2008 Logan Bot All Rights Reserved.