|
333Storm333 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
My 2/3 year old 208 mghz phone runs even faster then that buggy tytn2 lol
AznShowStoppa (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
i donno about you but i just got my htc tytn 2 yesterday and installed tomtom and it runs smoother then my tomtom gps itself.
651bobby (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
no, it's a genneral problem with all T2's. the HTC rom, and the ports of the WM6 ron to the OEM (like Tmob) do use hardware opmisation on the graphics, which it is capable of doing.
foundede (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Tytn II/ATT Tilt displays at 15 f/s...there's the problem.
AznShowStoppa (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
cuz you got crappy branded tytn2, get the unbranded unlocked one, its very quick, i have it.
killakeithizgr8 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
you have the tytn II which is the kaiser but the tytn II/ att tilt dosent have the camera on from the kaiser is on tmobile in the uk
ogrenator (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
not sure what the deal is cause i have the kaiser but its not tmobile its att and it runs better than both of those phones....makes no sense to me if you say they are the same
bigbadwolfami (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I just got my wife a xv6900 and I can confirm it cannot play video smoothly with any amount of massaging. I cannot believe this is a final product! Her old 6700 destroyed this new phone in playing ability.
jakcrow (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
This is not fake. The Tytn II's ROM is missing the needed video driver, which is why it's performance is so bad. In it's current state, it's like running your PC without the video drivers. That's all, and it's ridiculous that HTC isn't doing anything about it. What's so hard to comprehend here?
FloatingFatMan (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The DON'T run the same speed. To keep up, the TyTn II is forced to drop a LOT of frames, and this carries on through every single application. |
