|
Gilgamesh73 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Ronald was so full of himself.
Brew4me111 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
tolkein says so himself in the forward of the fellow ship of the ring that the story is not an alagory for anything. it is his own history that he made up.
StLucas776 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
wagner's ring cycle was an opera, and the only ring mentioned was a ring made by a dwarf with gold stolen from the rhine river. it certainly involved a lot of norse mythology, and may indeed have inspired tolkein, but in no way is he ripping it off
jonkind (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
you must be joking right. he is a hack ? He is not acknowledged as a great writer ? where the f*** did you come from ? now see, i never even heard of a wagner ring trilogy isnt that funny ?
mythicalpoet (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Tolkien ripped off Wagner's Ring Trilogy--do the research for yourself before you bitch and moan and attack my character. And besides that he shares the profound racism of Wagner. You are probably ignorant of that fact as well. Tolkien was a literary hack and people would do well to know that. This is why he is not ackowledged as a great writer.
rodog69 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
How Eru(Ilúvatar) or God as he is referred to by Tolkien here. Was of very little resembles to the Catholic God. But here is a little fun fact. When Gandalf died in the fight with the Balrog, it was beyond the power of the Valar to resurrect him: Ilúvatar himself intervened to send Gandalf back.
Cmey2k (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
what I speak about Tolkien snd mythology is common knowledge and not debated as to it's authenticity among scholars. i am speaking specifically of pagan fertility gods.
roac7777 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I have to beg to differ Cmey2k insomuch that there is alot of Greek Mythology and Norse mythology in the books, ie: The Greek panteon of gods and norse ie The Undying lands - Valhalla. There are no churches, no Jesus or messiah.Wizards, trolls, orcs, dragons are all part of norse myth.In the end, like I have said before, there lies the readers interpretation of the spiritual side of the books.
roac7777 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Firstly, I dont like your foul language commercialx, very orc like.Secondly, with all art whether it be books, paintings and sculptures the artist has his/her own interpretation but just as importantly so does the reader or the viewer.When we talk about our own interpretation we dont mean the main story line we are referring to the spiritual/religous side of the book.Have a care and think before you write scurrilous remarks.
Lion117 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
astoundin' |
