|
ramosrosalinda (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Thank yoou for letting us hear the master
sarastro71 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Che bello ho trovato la Mara Zampieri dei controtenori!!!
zexyman (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I'm disappointed that he didn't change the melody at all for the DC. Listen to Marilyn Horne's performance, she made it much more interesting on the repeat.
wujingcdh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
jaroussky has a good head voice, yes,but as we know, his depth of timbre,even his coloratura skill are not the best.差不多......
jfbecks17 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Good singing, diction a little iffy though...
gesinella (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
You are perfectly right- Jaroussky has a real special timbre, a perfect coloratura and also a deep understanding of Baroque music, but in less brilliant arias Jacobs and Deller are far better, to my op.. Take "Music for a while" by Purcell- Jaroussky's version doesn't have the depth and the fullness of timbre which have Deller and Jacobs. So they are two different things; I believe that comparing Jaroussky and Jacobs is nearly as useless as comparing a symphony by Haendel with one by Mahler...
senesino83 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Actually his teacher was mainly Levitt, I think.
wujingcdh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
wonderful!he's really good. he was Scholl's teacher.
arbiter59840 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
la justesse de sa voix est magnifique
choirkid610 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
thank you... and doesn't it feel like Handel wrote the bass line and the treble line for the strings in two different time signatures... you have a combo of what sounds like 16th notes and it seems like 8th notes... it makes me get and twirl in 3 even though we are in 6/8 |
