|
RashadGl (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
can you add draw it in sketchup i will help you. if you want a 3d animation i will do it for you. email (RashadGlover AT gmail.c o m)
ZeroFossilFuel (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I believe the more magnet the better, right up to the point where the fields from adjacent magnets merge too closely. 4 is an easy number to work with, so is 6.
billmcg980 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
will it work any better with more magnets or is four best
ZeroFossilFuel (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Inconsequential, at least at this scale.
goolsnfc (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Would the energy wasted changing the direction of the bearing rotation 4 time per revolution be less?
ZeroFossilFuel (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Thought about that. If I biased it I could eliminate half the raceway. Problem is the stator must be DRIVEN in both directions. Doing so with a spring would impose unnecessary drag.
goolsnfc (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Hi ZFF,I have a tendency to simplify so take or leave this comment.Can you bias the bearing to one side with a spring or bungie and then use one rail? hap
I3ursucu (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yap. It needs to be more than a page of text, so post some more as I do right now. I don't want this post to be this big, but I'm doing it so, hopefully it will be enough to push the oldest message to page 2 and now I don't know what to write anymore and so I will stop :D. Waiting for the breakthrough.
PMorphy65 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I think it happens automatically once there are enough comments to fill this page. That's what I've noticed elsewhere, but I'm just guessing.
ZeroFossilFuel (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Can anyone tell me how I reverse the order of these posts and put newest at the top? |
