Search:

battlebots robot combat build robot fighting robots robot weapons robot competition rovio robot robot wars



Flight 175 - Impossible speed

Robot Building and Competition Videos
Robot Building and Competition Videos Robot Building and Competition Videos
Robot Building and Competition Videos

Here is a clip confirming what Joseph Keith had already established, That flight 175 could not have possibly travelled anywhere near 500 MPH at 700ft altitude. Verified by Boeing spokeswoman Leslie Hazzard and Boeing engineer Lori Bechtold. http://www.pumpitout.com--

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: September 22, 2007 at 3:22 am
Author: pumpitout

Length: 06:25
Rating: 4.45
Views: 61999

Tags: 11  175  911  flight  september  wtc  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

HeavyPlant70 (October 1, 2008 at 12:18 pm)
Ok... what hit it then? And what happened to flight 175 and all the passengers??
CORP7USA7IS7BK (September 30, 2008 at 12:07 pm)
I agre with you 110%. there is tooooooo much fraud surrounding every bit of this. It will not be much longer until they all pay for their crimes
hypnotstcollector (September 27, 2008 at 10:54 pm)
we are told 10k/ftpermin but we are shown by the media different angles of the hit. Like the very shallow angle approach w/ Dan Rather voice. But flt 175 din't hit the WTC. something else hit it.
simonshack (September 16, 2008 at 12:49 pm)
Mike Bellone was one of many bogus stories made up from scratch to perpetuate the 'plane' myth. I remember exchanging mails with him years ago. He was nice and responded something like "if you want to know more just call me " and gave me his cellphone number. I called and called, just to hear his voice on an answering machine. I left him messages. He never got back to me.
Focoist911 (September 14, 2008 at 3:50 am)
Alright then everyone - the plane was going 330mph. Who gives a fuck? It will shake itself apart, but it didn't have long to last anyway.
Focoist911 (September 14, 2008 at 3:47 am)
They weren't depending on the plane lasting that long. It was remote piloted that much we can be certain of.
YHVH72 (September 14, 2008 at 2:35 am)
A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still. I do not waste time on this. If all four planes had been painstakingly reconstructed like every other major commercial airline disaster, all this suspicion could have been avoided. But they were in too big a hurry to clean up the crime scene to prevent any thorough investigation. This to me is one of the biggest smoking guns of all...no plane reconstructions.
atwitsend (September 14, 2008 at 2:23 am)
lying with pixels, no holograms they were CGI's. plane fly bys? deceptions?think. hide what they really did. thesocialservice(.)it
YHVH72 (September 14, 2008 at 1:53 am)
I don't care if it was the originally scheduled flight plane or not. It could have been another entirely different plane that looked like it and remote controlled. But real planes hit the towers on 09/11/01 is all I'm saying. I'm aware of all the hologram technology we have, but not that day.
atwitsend (September 14, 2008 at 1:46 am)
real planes? and the FAA data on flight 175 says it was still flying in 05/ was deregulated in 05... you believe in cartoons and that newtons 3 rd law of motion never existed on 911


Robot Building and Competition Videos © 2008 Logan Bot All Rights Reserved.