|
ymh67 (July 4, 2008 at 1:10 pm)
So many people dont want to believe there is evil in all forms and in many places its starts in the begining of the Bible... People dont be Blind OPEN YOUR EYES If there is good there must be evil
cdddraftsman (June 3, 2008 at 3:56 pm)
P-1The WTC designers concluded that the most likely way in which an aircraft would hit the towers would be if it were lost in heavy fog and low on fuel and flying at landing speed. The aircraft chosen was the most common type then flying in the area, the Boeing 707, which had a gross weight of 263,000 and a landing speed of 180 miles per hour. In the case of what actually happened, 767-200ER aircraft, each weighing 274,000 pounds
cdddraftsman (June 3, 2008 at 3:56 pm)
P-2struck the towers at speeds of 470 and 590 (!) miles per hour. Given that force rises exponentially with velocity, it is a testimony to the robustness of the structural system of the buildings that they were not immediately destroyed by the impact. The study points out that on the impact faces of the building, more than 2/3 of the supporting ext. columns were destroyed, yet the load on the remaining columns only rose to their theoretical capacity.
cubeprisioner8 (June 2, 2008 at 1:11 pm)
Does this explain the squibs? Nope.. Was much of the building below the point of impact undamaged? Yes.. Why then did the whole thing collapse? Hmmm.. Explosives? Must be..
cdddraftsman (May 31, 2008 at 10:49 pm)
P-1The WTC designers concluded that the most likely way in which an aircraft would hit the towers would be if it were lost in heavy fog and low on fuel and flying at landing speed. The aircraft chosen was the most common type then flying in the area, the Boeing 707, which had a gross weight of 263,000 and a landing speed of 180 miles per hour. In the case of what actually happened, 767-200ER aircraft, each weighing 274,000 pounds
cdddraftsman (May 31, 2008 at 10:48 pm)
P-2struck the towers at speeds of 470 and 590 (!) miles per hour. Given that force rises exponentially with velocity, it is a testimony to the robustness of the structural system of the buildings that they were not immediately destroyed by the impact. The study points out that on the impact faces of the building, more than 2/3 of the supporting ext. columns were destroyed, yet the load on the remaining columns only rose to their theoretical capacity.
cubeprisioner8 (May 20, 2008 at 2:38 pm)
Barking up the wrong tree. It does not matter what hit the pentagon. "Squibbs" can be seen below the exterior collapse points during the collapse of the WTC's. This is all the evidence you need to know we were not told the truth. Bottom line.. We secured 20 more years of energy and stopped the world from turning against us. Minimized loss of life and America can carry on. If you don't like your way of life here get out.
cdddraftsman (April 27, 2008 at 9:38 pm)
When a crime occurs in the 'real world', the list suspects, motives etc. is pared down as evidence works to exculpate the innocent and incriminate the guilty. When a crime occurs in Kookworld , the list of suspects, motives etc. ALWAYS EXPANDS . Why?
cdddraftsman (April 27, 2008 at 9:37 pm)
"otherwise it loses it's lift" Was that meant to be funny ? Jet planes have been flying at tree top levels for 50 years now trying to avoid radar . Seems when ever a CTer needs another construct they just reinvent the science and say what ever farts out the cheeks of their aho ...eh ?
cdddraftsman (April 27, 2008 at 9:37 pm)
GWB in an August 2006 speech, which declared that terrorism springs from "subcultures of conspiracy & misinformation," & that "terrorists recruit effectively from pop's whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods & corrupted by CT's . The distortions keep alive grievances & filter out facts that would challenge popular prejudices & self-serving propaganda."strongly criticized the endorsement of CT's by the US left-wing, alleging that it was a sign of "theoretical emptiness." |
