jimmyxx3 (August 20, 2008 at 4:27 am)

Ground support i meant.Oops my mistake.

Th3D3f3nd3rX (August 18, 2008 at 11:19 am)

ummm it provide ground support dude not air support they learned that it couldnt be used as air support due to the example of "the battle of britain" but other then that your right

jimmyxx3 (August 17, 2008 at 8:55 am)

Vspvk you dont know anythin man...This plane probably never misses.Plus it is a tank buster cause this plane provides air support and they dont destroy infantrys they bust armer vehicles and maby other stuff.Plus lucky hits?This plane dropping bomb or firing that anti tank cannon and having direct hit is just wat it will always do.

Nikicazvanizlikovac (August 4, 2008 at 7:28 pm)

Sorry because my poor English!I hawent seen stupidest video,more than half of this scenes are from movies,not documentaris,that were shoot after war,especialy when t34 hit some whencile,that movie i have seen,and it is in color.just few things to know about stuka,first,thank buster,dont mean that blow up whole tank,just shoot at rear of tank to brake it engine,that is enough imobile tank is easu to be destroy by infrantry,just remeber that!think why elephand/ferdinand was a bad project!

andefag (July 21, 2008 at 8:08 pm)

Without hitler, goering and those fools the germans wouldn't have needed a hundred more heroes.But, without those fools germany would probably not have started the war.

Usulic (July 14, 2008 at 8:58 pm)

Your argumentation is severly lacking, my friend. In the middle of '44, Germany had few resources and production facilities left, and, as we all know, aircraft isn't exactly cheap to produce. Ceased production of Ju-87 doesn't say anything about it's quality. And if an aircraft can be called tankbuster depends on it's capabilities, not percentages. A "modern" (cough) A-10 also is and stays a tank killer, regardless of how many kills are made by other weapon systems during a campaign.

vspvk (July 9, 2008 at 11:18 am)

Only about 5% of soviet tanks were destroyed by aircraft (mostly by bombs lucky direct hits), hence no WW2 aircraft deserves the name of "tank buster". As far as I remember in middle 1944 production of JU-87G stoped. Ceased production clearly shows how really "effective" JU-87G was against tanks. Soviet attempts to mount AT guns on aircraft failed too (different variants of il-2, Yak-9T).

tully5111helmets (July 5, 2008 at 6:57 pm)

hail to a hero,would have loved to be his wing-man knowing he would never leave a buddy behind.100 more of these heros and without those fools hitler,goering they would have beaten those slavic,commie halfwits.

laupiaslammas (July 3, 2008 at 3:02 pm)

Thanks to stukas at 1944 Tali Ihanttala Finland surrived.

ThunderHenshin32 (June 20, 2008 at 6:05 am)

i believe you can search about Hans Ulrich Rudel in youtube.