USAFalling (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

SLAUGHTERING THE NATIVE PALESTINIAN POPULATION AT A RATIO OF 8 to 1 YEAR AFTER YEAR AND THEN CLAIMING ISRAEL IS THE VICTIM OF 'TERRORISM' AND ANTISEMITISM` IS SIMPLY LAUGHABLE BY ANY RATIONAL LOGIC RELIGION OR CREED!. NO EXCUSES ARE `ACCEPTABLE FOR THESE LEVELS OF USA AND UK SPONSORED TERROR!. NOT EVEN THE TANAK ALLOWS KILLING BEYOND AN EYE FOR AN EYE.NOTE: Sources for the "8 vs 1" ratio is BeT Selem Israeli Human Rights GroupHELP COPY & PASTE THIS COMENT ON MANY OTHER ISRAEL VIDEOS!

connorryan (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Who was that heckler?

themiff (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

TYRANT - any person in a position of authority who exercises power oppressively or despotically.With his sending thousands of soldiers to death, excessive war efforts and choices, and his flagrant overriding the choice of the majority...I truly believe that Bush will first go down in history as the worst US president, and in time, as a tyrant.Unlike most historical tyrants, though, he was not acting alone.

mad3noyer (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Things are looking up, actually. Nobody voted for Nader.

votePEACEvoteNADER (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I hope the ideas that Ralph's been talking about like: congressional watchdog groups public demands for time slot ownership on our TV and radio airwaves, then selling prime time slots to finance true public programming (like debates). Instant Runoff Votingbecome the focus of ALL progressives, regardless of the many factions they may align themselves with (it will benefit them all).Imagine the effect.

0613162k (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ „ø¤º°¨ ¨°º¤ø„ Vote „ø¤º°¨ ¸„ø¤º°¨Nader ``°º¤ø„¸ ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø Comment on this video

cadfish (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

you think the ones who did this were liberals?they're smart, rich and have good lawyers. but they're not liberals- a liberal '08

evalipay (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I come from a dictatorship: we have one candidate.Here, in land of democracy we have two.So whats the big fuss all about?!!!Its a shame they do not allow Ralphand Matt participate in the debates.They are the candidates with a record of getting thing done for the people and have clear definition of change and hope, (not fluff) and are not planning to Obliterate Iran from the map.So I want to use the media of the people by the people and do this the old fashioned way by volunteering

StratusBlue (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Truth. It is clear. Nader indicts the Federal Reserve cartel. He lays out grounds for high treason. That my friends is what truthful people do.2.3 Trillion Dollars was lost by the Pentagon. It was announced because a whistle blower exposed the fraud. It is entirely ignored by YOUR CORRUPT CONGRESS.The VERY NEXT DAY, the SEC headquarters was vaporized in NYC.2 innocent countries were invaded for having a CIA dictator and CIA run poppy fields.Painful truths. We are run by crooks.

zalazalaza (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

WOW! Nader has been instituting change since the 70's. It's ignorant to suggest a struggle for the right candidate is wrong if he doesn't win the 1st x. The next time you're issued a voucher for a missed/cancelled flight, your neighbor gets help with her addiction while pregant, your kid doesn't choke on an unsafe toy, your drinking water is cleaner, your parents got help with a denied pension, you get a Pell Grant, your cigatette doesn't burn your house down you can thank Ralph Nader. JACKASS!