Egyptian2k9 (August 14, 2008 at 7:20 pm)

Why not , dont tell you believe those plane would make this building crash...Man , this is a top secret job , I am sure they trained the guy who used to those bombs without being caught ... Marvin Bush is the chief security of this building.... Its easy to not being caught in a building of 10 000 peoples...

bofrustian (August 11, 2008 at 4:29 pm)

How do you explain 3 steel buildings going down with zero resistance at free-fall speed? The state of the art demolition prep was carried out while guess who was head of secruity for WTC?

socomagent6 (August 9, 2008 at 8:08 pm)

anyone who thinks explosives could have been planted on every floor without any one of the thousands of people working there noticing something was wrong is just a dumbass

bofrustian (August 7, 2008 at 2:05 am)

The official explanation is the "pancake idea" in which the upper floors fall onto the lower ones in succession--problem with that is that each succeeding floor would have to start accelerating from zero--and what happened is that all three buidings came down at "free fall speed". That could only happen by exploding each floor's supports in timed succession, which we see. It's so amazing how even intelligent people can't accept what's in front of them if it posits a whole new scary reality.

subreg123 (August 5, 2008 at 9:44 am)

bastard bush planned the attack himself as an escape goat to invade the Middle East. WMD's is a load of crap the military isn't even looking for Bin-Laden he was never in Iraq to begin with bush just wanted the oil fields there. Never in the history of the U.S. has there been a presidency as devastating to not only the United States but to the whole world.

ColonelAllan (August 5, 2008 at 12:45 am)

I see, the fireproofing was all knocked off in the initial impact, allowing the fire to freely deprive every inch of steel of it's integrity. Hence all the dust?

cartmaningi (August 4, 2008 at 8:42 am)

The moast stupid video ever. Ever wonder why building codes require fireproofing the steel? The one who made this video knows nothing abut constructions. ZERRO! NADA!

ColonelAllan (July 30, 2008 at 11:14 pm)

90% of the building didn't suffer any heat from fires, yet most of it turned to powder. Woodworm? That's got to be a new species.

KimmoKuopio (July 30, 2008 at 6:46 pm)

9/11 truthers thinк metal is not effected by fire. They thinк Steel I-Beams дre cut down from the magical I-Beam forrest! LolEver wonder why building codes require fireproofing the steel ¿?

SkepticalProgressive (July 30, 2008 at 2:01 am)

Has anyone ever claimed that fire alone brought down building 7? The official report cites massive internal structural damage by flaming debris from the other towers. The surrounding towers were also damaged in this way and were later demolished. Building 7 was on fire for 6 hours with footage of the giant gash down its side and other camera angles show that the damaged side fell first. The famous "pull building 7" comment was a reference to the evacuation of the building by the fire dept.