EvilJOEFX (October 10, 2008 at 3:52 pm)

Considering its done by the Sifu, I would hope so. :P

sousukesagaraJKD (August 27, 2008 at 4:22 pm)

Wing Chun! Not Ving Tsun!

superhumansight (August 19, 2008 at 9:45 pm)

this is one of the best Ving Tsun demonstrations i have seen. stable horse, simultaneous offense and defense, relaxed technique. very impressive.

bwang (April 23, 2008 at 5:44 am)

forever spring!! down with the munchurian!!

chisauboy (April 21, 2008 at 12:26 am)

This is solid video. Sifu Kam has excellent form and demonstrates many of the basic techniques, especially capturing the centerline and controlling the opponent. Good upper and lower body technique. Notice how each techique has simultaneous offense and defense. Wing Chun is all about capturing the centerline and using redirecting the opponents force - never go against force. Let's keep the comments about technique and not about silly stuff like the spelling of WC. Silly people.

smokefan1420 (April 13, 2008 at 1:23 pm)

well put

Kantzarakos (April 12, 2008 at 9:11 pm)

Well, even though you still train by using the techniques and forms, they are considered theory. It's only natural to find it hard to apply the theory into action without practicing. Thus, you need to do some sparring. Range, timing and other technical aspects are one thing, but you also get mentally prepared to fight another person. Doing some free style practice from time to time doesn't hurt, either ;)

666zakk666 (April 10, 2008 at 1:38 pm)

Wing chun and ving tsun are both the correct spellings some people believe that one is sport orientated but this is not correct. Some peopl spell how they pronounce and translate and others spell in english how they would pronounce it and thats Wing Chun

smokefan1420 (April 3, 2008 at 9:36 pm)

instead of arguing whether wing chun or ving tsun is the correct spelling, how about you guys pull your heads out your asses and call it Yong Chun. or Forever Springtime Fist.

smokefan1420 (April 3, 2008 at 9:34 pm)

well is this your opinions or is it fact as you stated?