nosaintss (August 30, 2008 at 4:56 am)

man shut da fuk up you probaly dont know where torry holt or steve smith cam from what college dey went to if u so much about football. what number did torry holt were when he first came in the nfl.i hate people that think dey no nfl but they dont

DB3HEAT (August 30, 2008 at 2:23 am)

OK were done, we've probably been argueing for an hour now about shit, and neither has really been arguing about the same thing. Sorry dude, I got carried away, I was so bored, and I just love to argue. Well I'm getting off.

DB3HEAT (August 30, 2008 at 2:21 am)

Don't read half my comment, and take my words out of context and then bash me for shit I didn't say or do. You all should learn to read. The only people I have dissed, are the stupid hick NC fans, not saying all of them are, but their are alot, that deserved to be dissed. Not like anyone on here has never hated on someone, all you are hypocrites.

nflpanthersrock (August 30, 2008 at 2:19 am)

i see what ya mean, and by stat-wise i also meant more consistent

DB3HEAT (August 30, 2008 at 2:18 am)

Just because I say Holt is better, doesn't mean I think Smith sucks. All I'm saying is Holt is ALOT better, that is what I've been saying. Did I once in this comment say Smith sucks??? No like all my others, all you bastards should read through my whole comment, or not read them at all.

DB3HEAT (August 30, 2008 at 2:16 am)

I never dissed Smith like I said. Sure he's a more electric player, but he isn't a better WR. all his great plays are made after the catch. Holt makes great catches. Smith is a great player, but Holt is a greater WR by far, and it is easier to see he has more experience, runs better routes, has better hands, and has much better awarness, cause he is better, plain and simple. All you NC fans read half my posts and then falsely accuse me of saying Smith sucks, cause your all biased and can't read.

nflpanthersrock (August 30, 2008 at 2:11 am)

that's cool :P the argument was you called nc fans hicks tory holt is better, but it's the fact for smiths size and he was a 3rd round pick. now he's such a threat, he makes insane plays. like how he gets hit in mid-air and keeps going, the texans game when he got like the whole texans defense on him (lol), and got out and took for a touchdown. thats what i mean, torry is better stat-wise. smith is better play-wise. so it plays out, ya know?

DB3HEAT (August 30, 2008 at 2:11 am)

Holt had over 6,300 yards after 6 years anyway, and was the fastest player to 10,000 yards in NFL history, so you can shut up about the year difference, as if it made a difference. Holt had about 400 more yards in 6 years, than Smith had in 7...again, I use stats to prove Holt is alot better, now that I have logically PROVED IT, i'm done. Please feel free to talk to yourself, about how Smitty is just a bit worse, and a top 5 WR ever...and you can use all your biased excuses too. feel free.

DB3HEAT (August 30, 2008 at 2:02 am)

Holt came in in 99, Smith in 01, that is two years mathmatician. Holt has over double Smiths yardage in 2 more years. Holts played 9 years and has over 12,000 yards, Smith 7 years and under 6,000 yards...again, I don't see what your driving at. The only thing I've been talking about is Holt being better than Smith, cause that was the argument, and I use stats to suport my point...those are basics of an arguement...idiot. You and I both know Holt and Smiths career aren't even close. I hope.

nflpanthersrock (August 30, 2008 at 1:55 am)

pretty sure i pointed out the whole point of the argument, and you kept changing the subject to stats, and tory holt.