|
dozercat (June 30, 2008 at 12:27 pm)
"In Australia they measure how many liters of fuel is used per 100 kilometers." >> Same in Europe. What you get with it is a number that doesn't need conversion to reflect what is actually happening on the road, so it does make more sense.
shadowflames43 (June 30, 2008 at 9:25 am)
While I realize that the video does little with what it shows, that's more of because it doesn't try to suggest where you should aim when looking at MPG, or even GPM. All this video is saying is that it's not always very useful to upgrade to a new vehicle. And at certain prices, that's not worth much. If you're getting 25 MPG, even at 4 dollars a gallon, 50 MPG likely isn't worth it. Where as 10 to 20 could easily be worth it.
zudthespud (June 30, 2008 at 8:59 am)
what i don't get is that people slag off air travel as the most polluting form of transport when actually the milage per gallon per person on a flight is alot more than pretty much all cars on the road.
klzeeeh (June 30, 2008 at 6:13 am)
driving aggressively, a bmw m3 is more fuel economical than a toyota prius.
fstwrtr (June 30, 2008 at 4:16 am)
Excellent video. however, in an unrelated but still consumer matter, to gain the advantage dollar wise, one has to consider the cost of vehicle. if you are not paying for the fuel to run it..you will be paying for the price of the car....I pose this thought:...a car that gets 10mpg and is paid for costs nothing while not running..a car that gets 50 mpg is costing you even while sitting idle...to summarize. if your car is paid for dont trade for a payment even if you get 10mpg unless you pay cash
12u34me (June 30, 2008 at 1:50 am)
in cincinnati,and every city ive been, very few are getting the advertised MPG , its driving style, how you accelerate, alot of drivers i see, are in a huge hurry, sacrificing efficiency for impatience. Causing accidents, and close calls.
makanimike (June 29, 2008 at 9:24 pm)
While you're at it you guys should switch to the metric system! :)sound engineering and logical norms aren't the US's strength;)(fire away;P )
dpmwcmlmatt (June 29, 2008 at 8:29 pm)
i saw a chart in car and driver, they showed how almost all of the asian cars lost like 10 mpg while the cars by GM and in general american cars either lost very little or sometimes even gained one or two mpg's. overall though, i am in favor of the gallons per mile strategy.
jpbalkenende (June 29, 2008 at 5:18 pm)
Yeah doesn't make much sense but it's really interesting nonetheless. The fact is a lot of people still buy inneficient SUVs and trucks(though those sales are luckily crashing) and slight increase in efficiency of big vehicles makes a big difference.
CANTvoteHillary (June 29, 2008 at 4:45 pm)
Perhaps the government should MANDATE that no passenger vehicle sold in the United States should get below 10 MPG.How many millions of gallons of gas would be conserved? What would be the reduction in green house gases?? How much would our balance of trade improve?? etc... |
