|
RohanRugby (August 19, 2008 at 12:34 am)
What's the figure, 40 million people killed by abortion in the USA since Rowe V Wade?How lethal is the American left?
RohanRugby (August 19, 2008 at 12:17 am)
John T Flynn wrote a several books and articles noting the same thing that Goldberg has, who paid him? Eric von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Friedrich Hayek (a Nobel Prize winner), George Orwell, Eugene Methvin and a dozen or more others all noted the bonds between fascism and American liberalism, who paid them? The truth is the truth and just saying "somebody paid them to say that," will not change it.
TylerNull (August 18, 2008 at 2:34 am)
The largest slaughter of US citizens by the US government was under the last Democrat President, Bill Clinton, the horny hick from Arkansas. SEVENTY SIX law abiding citizens were slaughtered -- incluiding 21 children. Unlike the loners to which you reference, Democrat fascism is sponsored by the Democrat Party. To this day, Democrats defend their mass extermination programs, e.g., abortion.Democrats LOVE fascism.
TylerNull (August 18, 2008 at 2:29 am)
All the groups you list are all sponsored exclusively by Leftist organizations, e.g., the ACLU. Further, the KKK is Democrat spawned from Democrat regions from Democrat's failed attempt at enforcing their "right" to own slaves. (You lost the war, but kept your bizarre interpetation of "rights".) Also, Nazis are SOCIALISTS. Finally, you left out the largest, most violent and most prolific groups -- the tribes spawned in Democrat owned, Democrat run kill zones ("inner cities") -- "Street Gangs".
molloyx (August 16, 2008 at 2:30 am)
The harsh reality Goldberg goes to great lengths to avoid is this; the extreme right wing in American has been markedly more lethal than its counter-part; witness the body count at Oklahoma City [ including children] the bombing in Atlanta and countless murders at abortion clinics. More recently, in Knoxville, we have a fully armed ditto-head murdering Unitarians for their tolerance of gay Americans. No one does hate better than the right.
molloyx (August 16, 2008 at 2:24 am)
What Golderg studiously avoids, per the nature of his ugly project, is any decent examination of the American Nazi party and all its off shoots, which include the Christian Identity Movement, Arayan identified prison gangs, allegiance with the KKK, various white separatist groups, Idaho survivalist extremists, Posse Comitas [sp]and, yes the Turner Diaries, the sacred text for Timothy McVeigh, Americas premier terrorist. The level of dishonesty per ommission is stunning.
localhost008 (August 15, 2008 at 7:02 pm)
Changing the meaning of fascism doesn't change the fact that Neocons indeed promote the classical definition of fascism. The fact is that people like Goldberg are paid by conservative thinktanks like The Heritage Foundation to find and enforce weak links between Liberalism in the US and elements of the modern world the malleable Right-Wing Authoritarian Followers have been conditioned to be bigoted and prejudiced against.You are being lied to by these people for their own political gain.
stgianna (August 15, 2008 at 6:28 pm)
He is using quotes from the people who were involved in both facisim and liberalism (FDR) to demonstrate the connection. read the book. you don't know what you are talking about. How can you comment on Goldberg's arguement when you do not know what it is in the first place?
stgianna (August 15, 2008 at 6:26 pm)
Socialism is a religion of the State, where the state controls the means of production of goods and their distribution. It is an authoritarian. Mussolini coined the term Totalitarian becasue that is what these facist stated (including Russia) were: the TOTAL control of the conuntry. FDR once said that He was doing the same thing in the US (the new deal) that hitler, mussolini and stalin were doing in europe. The US was mre organized/civilized about it. That quote is in the book. read it.
stgianna (August 15, 2008 at 6:24 pm)
This is exactly the logic that Golberg does NOT use in his book. He is very explicit and explains that this is not his assertion. Read the book before you comment so you know what you are talking about. |