4466957 (October 6, 2008 at 10:33 pm)

they are sweet i want one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

teamzulu16 (October 5, 2008 at 7:45 pm)

but the wheels are on the front?! lol

bugboss55 (October 3, 2008 at 4:36 am)

Most of you haven't test drove the Spyder, but all have an opinon based on...shit for brains

bugboss55 (October 3, 2008 at 4:34 am)

32 mpg

guyNbluejeans (September 28, 2008 at 3:29 am)

Hmm I think you might have something there, though with those old ATVs they had fat, bouncing tires that didn't do so well with the outrageous ways people were riding them.I think that two wheels in the back would be a lot more comfortable and could be fairly safe if the whole design was tailored to reasonable riding conditions, versus hitting whoop-tee-doos at crazy speeds ... .But for sure, your point about the braking is on the money.

pantera1125 (September 28, 2008 at 2:55 am)

Because the front is where all the braking and steering happen. Two wheels in the back are a death trap like the ATCs of the 80's.

ydoubledog (September 12, 2008 at 8:37 pm)

looks sweet

CarManiac82 (September 12, 2008 at 1:00 am)

I think I'm gonna stick to buying Ducati 848 white pearl :) next season.

jerz40 (September 12, 2008 at 12:20 am)

$14999-16999

JooKed (September 5, 2008 at 8:15 pm)

I thought the whole point of having a bike was to lean over and hit the twisties. I'd rather take a ham sandwich than be stuck with a can am. I guess its not a "bike" but more like a "Im a pussy that doesnt know what to do with his money"