|
alienpatentoffice (July 7, 2008 at 5:01 pm)
Just a thought in passing...If it has a chip, it has information. If it has information, it could be hack. We can substitute bad information with good information which makes the chip a white elephant. Hackers will end up being heroes for saving people and the world.
motive1999 (June 17, 2008 at 11:04 pm)
They could easily just put a secondary tag on the product much like those with the ink cartriges that destroy the product when opened without the unlocking device... but make it so that only the RFID chip being scanned can unlock it. This reality scares me so much.....
feeeeeebz (June 7, 2008 at 5:29 pm)
this is bullshitthey did not create these for RETAILthey created them for humans, after the bilderberg group told them to
devonrose742 (May 5, 2008 at 2:37 am)
IBM developed these products because no other company could! Apple, HP, Dell, they are all garbage and cannot compete with the superiority of IBM. My aging (and new) IBM equipment outperforms any opposing brands.
SeanSan00 (April 28, 2008 at 8:40 am)
You're still being monitored in the store, lol.Have fun being arrested.
Punkdownthestreet (February 10, 2008 at 7:00 am)
lol right there with yah man
TopFlightOnline (February 4, 2008 at 2:24 am)
Funny and agreed!
BenjaminFulford (October 24, 2007 at 2:40 pm)
The security mechanism and the RFID chip are not always the same mechanism.
tubekara (October 1, 2007 at 3:19 pm)
I think if Mc2525 is true, so another signal has to be generated when these antennas torn away
dowling1981 (September 25, 2007 at 3:54 pm)
MC2525 - have you portained them? |
