|
hillbrowjhb (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
SOVIET No go areas are places that were mainly once safe and pleasant to visit, shop, live, socialise , and now because of high levels of crime , and deprivation, are not safe for the ordinary decent persons to visit , for fear of being a crime victim or even murdered for your belongings like, cell phone , money or watch. Johannesburg ,Durban , Pretoria , and even parts of Cape Town ,have no go areas , particulary after dark.
sovietjoybuzzer (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"no go areas?" What do you mean? Who doesn't go there? As for a black person running a "modern" country--South Africa has not been UN-indexed as a 'developed economy' either under or since Apartheid--we shall see how Mr. Obama fares, especially in contrast too the last president of the US. But seriously, what is it about South Africa, hillbrow? I understand that wage disparities have grown, white money fled the cities since the end of the GAA--a lot like what happened in the 70s-90s US.
LijamGerrie (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Europe, being resourcesless, tiny frozen part of the world, could NOT contain millions of people nor provide the desperate needs of Whitman, with out decimating one another. Therefore, the cultural heritage of mutual destruction & the never quenching thirst for resources was expanded to include, decimating Gypsies, Eskimos, Jews, Red Indians, Aborigines & Africans. Those who gained from the destruction of millions of people will continue to justify their crimes & preach gospel to their victims.
hillbrowjhb (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Bap , as a ex (white) S.African, who lived under apartheid, and left in 1990, and have been back once recently to see the few remaining members of a very large extended family, who are still there. I cannot beleive the changes ,some for the good, but they are out weighted by the horrendous crime , of murder , hijacking, rape, in transit cash heist,etc. large areas of Joe Burg are no go areas , and people live in constant fear of crime. is this not proof that blacks cannot run a modern country.
Boethius51250 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The only thing Bush has to do with Zim is that he gives you an excuse not to take responsibility for anything. I suppose you are going say that the Ugandan rebels will blame Bush for murdering 500 civilians this last week in the Congo or that he destabilized their minds to do it. Get a grip bap, Mugabe couldn't manage to keep a cardboard box together, much less a country- he didn't need any help destroying Zim.
bapfontein (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
LA ROUCHE -COM
bapfontein (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Bote . What has Bush got o do with Zimbabwe, it obvious that either you are politically naive or simply cannot grasp how International politics and destabilisation works. You question might as well be ,"what has Bush got to do with Iraqi or Afghanistan".
SouthBoston88 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Reminds me of Obama's victory. Must be a black thing.
Boethius51250 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
What does Bush have to do with Mugabe? Seriously, this is the second time you defend Mugabe by attacking Bush. I'm an American and I'd be the first to agree that Bush is a tyrant-I didn't vote for him! But I wasn't coerced to either, like in Zim. You seriously cannot argue the facts. You are such a Black racist that you hate anything white. Over and over again its Mugabe hero this and evil whitey that. You are nothing more than a Marxist apologist for that genocidal maniac.
bapfontein (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
No one in their right mind would support the Liberation hero President Mugabe , who is revered throughout Africa. When President Mugabe attended a SADC summit S. Africa 2 years ago he was mobbed by thousands of S. Africans. Virtually every member attending the summit , stood and applauded him as he was interduced to speak. When your mad dog BUSH , visit countries led by pro American Governments , he cannot show his face in public as hundreds of thousands protest at his evil presence. |
