Search:

battlebots robot combat build robot fighting robots robot weapons robot competition rovio robot robot wars



Creationist Skeptics, Evolution and Religion

Robot Building and Competition Videos
Robot Building and Competition Videos Robot Building and Competition Videos
Robot Building and Competition Videos

Creationists are the ultimate skeptics http://www.sciam.com/article.c... http://saintgasoline.com/2007/... are the ultimate skeptics. They will believe in men being raised from the dead and talking ghosts that can impregnate virgins without even a shred of evidence, but when confronted with the evidence for biological evolution they transform into staunch critics upholding the highest burdens of proof ever constructed. The theory of evolution is actually supported with a wide array of evidence. Evolution is right up there with basic principles of elementary physics in terms of observational support. In the face of such overwhelming evidence, critics adopt standards of such unreasonableness that virtually nothing could be considered true if we applied such standards across all areas of inquiry and knowledge. The creationist's argument is based on selectively raising standards. If other proposed ideas were supported by evidence to the degree that biological evolution is, creationists would certainly not doubt these ideas, for example, the theory of gravity and the atomic theory. However, the theory of evolution is fair game for doubt, because creationists selectively demand implausible degrees of evidence for its truth, and won't accept anything less.Notice how these facts could only truly be considered criticisms of evolutionary theory if we expected complete and total mathematical proof for biological evolution. The problem, of course, is that empirical sciences do not deal with formal proofs of absolute certainty, and must instead rely on evidence and probability, like much of our every day knowledge.In normal scenarios, creationists do not have such high standards of proof. If, for instance, they found a half-eaten deer carcass surrounded by wolf paw prints, the reasonable conclusion is that the wolves ate the deer. If subsequently they found wolves near by, covered in deer blood, and analyzed the vomit of one wolf and found that it contained deer meat that would be further evidence in support of the rather obvious conclusion that wolves ate the deer in question.Now, if some wolf-loving skeptic wanted to protect the wolves from this charge of murder, he could adopt the creationist strategy and utilize unreasonably high standards of proof to shield him from criticism. He could argue, for instance, that because no one "observed" the wolves eating the deer, we could doubt the conclusion. For this skeptic, all the evidence pointing towards the wolves means nothing to him if we cannot directly observe the event in question. He could also remark that the wolf theory leaves out certain details. For instance, it doesn't tell us exactly how many wolves were involved, or whether the wolves first attacked from the right or left side, or whether the deer happened to be looking down at its feet when the attack occurred. They could argue that deer are faster than wolves so it is impossible. The skeptic could argue that these "gaps" in the theory rule out the wolf hypothesis.Of course, any reasonable person can see that the wolf skeptic sets his standards of proof way too high. We need not directly observe the event, nor explain every trite and inane detail in order to know that the wolves did indeed eat the deer. The evidence of the eaten deer carcass, the wolf paw prints, and blood spattered wolves, the deer meat in the vomit, and so on, all show without a doubt that the deer was eaten by the wolves.Creationists use almost the exact same sorts of arguments against evolution. When they argue that huge biological changes resulting from evolution have never been observed, they do not realize that scientists need not directly observe single-celled organisms becoming primates in order to reasonably conclude that such an event occurred, just as those who believe that the wolves ate the deer need not directly observe the event to know that it truly happened, given the abundance of evidence supporting the claim.

Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm
Author: FightingAtheist

Length: 08:08
Rating: 2.96
Views: 58844

Tags: atheism  atheist  bible  christian  church  creationism  evolution  faith  god  islam  jesus  mormon  religion  satan  science  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

1Volans (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Unreasonable High Standard of Proof?WTF? The video admits to no certain proof.Thanks!
1Volans (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
As a Son of God, making me superior, I don't go around making fun of atheists just because they lack a fully functioning brain.That would be as bad as kicking cattle or something.
DbzmasterdbzNecross (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yep. The only threat he actually poses now is just being annoying and taking up space on the comments board.
nolobede (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yes, 1tab is illiterate. Just a lonely wanker in a cave with nothing better to do with his right hand. Clic, paste, wank, click paste, wank. Not worth reading or responding. Tab displays no intellectual challenge. better to just read past and let the irrelevance show.
1ProudFemaleAtheist (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
More copying & pasting trolling from the asshole who can't write one sentence on his own, 1tabligh. The man has no shame. MORON.
1tabligh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
he will clearly see that he is moving in a certain direction together with the whole caravan of being. Without any desire or will on his part, he begins his life at a certain point, and again without willing it, he advances toward another point, one which is unknown to him. The same reality can be observed in all natural creatures, operating in a precise and orderly way.
1tabligh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Inclination to religion and belief in God, draw, in their initial stages, on instinctive motives and innate perceptions, but then they develop and evolve with the help of ratiocination and reflection. The roots of innate feeling in the disposition of man are so deep and, at the same time, so clear and evident that if a person purges his mind and his spirit both of religious concepts and of anti religious thoughts and then looks at himself and at the world of being, cont...
1tabligh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
A series of special modes of perception exist in man's being that are rooted in themselves, arise from the very stuff of man's nature, and do not owe their emergence to any external factor. Among these perceptions are the sense of commitment to trust, justice, veracity and honesty. cont....
Rissoleking (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Actually, 1tabligh, I've got a challenge for you - 50 words (consecutively) of English on ANY topic, that a) makes sense, and b) hasn't been taken from a website. There's a gold star in it for you...
Rissoleking (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Exactly. I'm reasonably sure 1tab doesn't speak English. Not that I'm abusing him for not being perfectly bilingual - I can only speak English and enough Italian to order a pizza - but I don't go onto Italian sites and talk shit I don't understand.


Robot Building and Competition Videos © 2008 Logan Bot All Rights Reserved.