|
plcj58 (October 13, 2008 at 3:03 pm)
SO? What are you going to bleeding heart fag loving liberal? Nothing. Not a damn thing.
joshuatree12 (October 13, 2008 at 12:35 pm)
O'riely is an idiot... Republican's mouth piece... I don't know how the hell someone will hire with for a TV.He is a disgrace for the profession of Journalism.
chirag2022 (October 13, 2008 at 4:33 am)
If you don't like Bush, keep clicking on McCain's False Ads they put out and repost the same Idea on clicking the ads on Blogs.The counter attack is coming.
ampface2003 (October 13, 2008 at 4:05 am)
O'Riley is a coward
daddymak8 (October 13, 2008 at 1:41 am)
I agree, that Bill O'Reilly is a Nazi prick.
TDGuitarJ729 (October 13, 2008 at 12:58 am)
It wasn't some huge conspiracy or anything... however, the U.S.'s involvement in the Middle East during the Cold War (specifically in Afghanistan) was not "fully cooked" - that is to say, they left Afghanistan in a horrible state, laying the groundwork for the resentment and animosity toward the U.S. that enabled terrorists like Bin Laden to gain power and influence. ... which is why Glick opposed the war in Afghanistan, because the ppl were being punished for the U.S.'s previous blunders.
TDGuitarJ729 (October 13, 2008 at 12:54 am)
If you listened, he wasn't talking about George Bush bringing down the Twin Towers (like the 9/11 "Truthers" believe) but what he was actually talking about was how the regime in Afghanistan and the fighters of Al-Quaida were trained by the U.S. - which they were. Not to bring down the Towers (as many people here seem to misinterpret) but to fight the Soviets in the 80s. They trained them. It's historty. And so the U.S. did - INDIRECTLY - have a part to play in laying the foundation for 9/11.
wilz1122 (October 13, 2008 at 12:32 am)
I feel for Jeremy Glick loosing his father, but he's views are radical as shit and far wacked out, one of those conspiracy nuts, everythings a conspiracy, left wing extremist views, what a bunch of funny ass bullshit!!
dliguori25 (October 12, 2008 at 9:22 pm)
Both teachers and the mainstream media tell you what they know (or what they want you to know). It is up to the individual to sort through this and make their opinions. To say he is just repeating what he was taught could be defended by saying that your view on the matter is also simply what you've been taught (regardless of if it was taught by a professor or bill oreilly). The reality is I'd rather listen to a professor than a talking head on tv.
mustangjc2000 (October 12, 2008 at 8:43 pm)
You accidently wrote an entirely true statement. The purpose of education is to teach an individual how to think. What you meant was that his professors taught him what to think, right? This country certainly isn't better off with people who don't know how to think, is it?Can you think? |
